Critique of Judgement by Immanuel Kant Chapter 22 Page 8

divided, to one another and to the whole, then regular figures and those of the simplest kind are needed, and the satisfaction does not rest immediately on the aspect of the figure, but on its availability for all kinds of possible designs. A room whose walls form oblique angles, or a parterre of this kind, even every violation of symmetry in the figure of animals (e.g. being one-eyed), of buildings, or of flower beds, displeases, because it contradicts the purpose of the thing, not only practically in respect of a definite use of it, but also when we pass judgement on it as regards any possible design.

This is not the case in the judgement of taste, which when pure combines satisfaction or dissatisfaction, — without any reference to its use or to a purpose, — with the mere consideration of the object.