basis of perspective estimates and semblances; and if, with the virtuous enthusiasm and stupidity of many philosophers, one wished to do away altogether with the “seeming world” — well, granted that YOU could do that, — at least nothing of your “truth” would thereby remain! Indeed, what is it that forces us in general to the supposition that there is an essential opposition of “true” and “false”? Is it not enough to suppose degrees of seemingness, and as it were lighter and darker shades and tones of semblance — different valeurs, as the painters say?

Why might not the world WHICH CONCERNS US — be a fiction? And to any one who suggested: “But to a fiction belongs an originator?” — might it not be bluntly replied: WHY? May not this